Five Point Play v2.1: A way too early off-season outlook

The team Marquette hypothetically would put out on the court today will look significantly different from the team fans see at Marquette Madness. But that won’t keep us from taking a way too early look at the off-season, and where five Marquette analysts expect to see the most improvement from the team.

A significant rule change from the NCAA, that college coaches are allowed to work with players over the summer two hours per day and up to eight hours per week, will be put into effect this year.

The team will return from brief visits home to begin summer workouts, which will consist of extensive work with head strength and conditioning coach Todd Smith, head trainer Ernest Eugene and, now, the rest of the coaching staff.

Brew City Ball’s Jim Ganzer said he expects the Milwaukee Summer Pro-Am to take place the first week of July, which will give fans their first look at the team since Phoenix. A maximum of two Division I teammates are allowed on each team, but the main focus will be on individual improvement (but more so a display of athleticism and fun).

Here is Paint Touches’ first edition of Five Point Play for the 2012-’13 season.

1. Which of Marquette’s three newcomers (Trent Lockett not included) will be most important to the team’s success next year?

Mark Strotman, Paint Touches: All aboard the Steve Taylor train. I have been as vocal as anyone about how good I believe Taylor can be ever since a conversation with Tony Benford back in February. Jae Crowder walked by on his way to the locker room, and Benford turned, saw Crowder and said, “He’s a lot like that guy.” Taylor already has the experience on playing what was essentially a national stage at Simeon, and his skill set is similar to Crowder, plus two inches. His importance to the second unit as the top rebounder and inside-out threat will be important to a team looking for scorers. He’s the real deal.

Matt Trebby, Marquette Radio: Prior to Lockett’s arrival, I would have said T.J. Taylor. Now I will go with Steve Taylor, but it still is close. T.J. is the type of player who will make an impact because of his style, but he will be the fifth guard in the rotation. So Steve will get more of a chance, with only Juan Anderson and Jamil Wilson to compete with. I say Steve, but I think T.J. would perform better if given the chance.

Anonymous Eagle: The rotation of Cadougan/Lockett/Blue/Mayo/D. Wilson is pretty solid on its own, so anything that T.J. Taylor and Ferguson can contribute to that end of things will be pure bonus. Buzz has said in the past that he expects that Steve Taylor will be able to step in immediately and contribute to filling in the gaping hole that is left behind by Jae Crowder’s departure. Considering how Taylor was able to fit in to a very talented Simeon team, and do his part to help them win three straight Illinois state titles, I expect he’ll be able to find ways to contribute to Marquette immediately.

Andrei Greska, Paint Touches: I was going to say Steve Taylor, but I’ll play devil’s advocate for this one. I’ll go with the other Taylor, T.J. Steve will turn out to be the best player from this class, but a true freshman will have a much tougher time adjusting to the rigors and physicality of low post, Big East basketball. T.J. has more experience and has the ability to step in right away if his shot is dropping. He will get a shot to fill in for Cadougan in limited slots, giving him ample opportunity for playing time.

MarquetteHoops.com: With the addition of Lockett I think Steve Taylor becomes the most important player for next season. I might have said T.J. Taylor a month ago, but Lockett eases concerns about scoring in the backcourt.  Replacing Jae Crowder will be extremely difficult, and it’s important Marquette has a guy who can provide solid minutes behind Wilson and solidify things on the glass.

2. Would you welcome a forward-oriented rotation that features Jamil Wilson, Davante Gardner and Chris Otule, or should Buzz Williams stay with a three-guard attack?

Mark Strotman, Paint Touches: It’s appealing, but not for more than 8-10 minutes per game. If everyone stays healthy, Buzz Williams will have the most front court flexibility since he arrived in Milwaukee. But the addition of Lockett will keep Marquette guard-oriented. That being said, a frontline of J. Wilson-Gardner-Otule has as much as versatility as any team in the Big East, and Williams will be able to implement it against the Georgetown’s and Syracuse’s of the world.

Matt Trebby, Marquette Radio: With Davante’s skill-set, he can play point guard! But seriously, those three can’t play together. Otule’s and Gardner’s lack of speed would create way too much of a defensive liability. As good of an idea as it may be, it is a bit unrealistic. I would say the three-guard lineup is the best option, especially with the five talented guards Marquette will have (Cadougan, T.J. Taylor, Blue, Mayo, Lockett), then go with Wilson/Steve Taylor/Juan and a center, and adjust whenever.

Anonymous Eagle: Whenever possible? Oh, no. No no no no no no no no. An occasional flash of a few minutes a game just to keep opponents on their toes, especially for down the road? Sure. But if you have all three out there for any extended time, then how long do you have to keep two of them out there while the third one catches a breather before coming back? Although, if Steve Taylor shows that he can contribute for long stretches right away….

Andrei Greska, Paint Touches: That’s a big NO. It’s great having the ability to go really big, but MU’s size would be best served being spread out. Otule and Gardner play way too similar a role and will see minimal minutes together, if at all. The three guard attack may not be the only alternative though, depending on the development of Steve Taylor and Juan. We saw Buzz use Gardner, Wilson and Jae together at times, and I think that we will see the reincarnation of that at times this year.

MarquetteHoops.com: I don’t foresee Marquette playing Otule and Gardner together.  However, if Steve Taylor or Juan Anderson can provide solid minutes, you might see stretches where one of them plays with Gardner/Otule and Wilson.

3. Of the returning players, whose progression are you most looking forward to?

Mark Strotman, Paint Touches: Vander Blue won the “Most Improved Award” at this year’s banquet, but people still don’t realize how much better he played in 2011-’12. Until the day he graduates, he will be the most intriguing player to watch in terms of progression. Last year, his role was similar and he outperformed his freshman year numbers. But this year, he will be called on to score. His field goal percentages must improve, but I really believe it’s only a matter of time before he makes “the jump.” This summer could be it.

Matt Trebby, Marquette Radio: The popular answer will be Juan Anderson, but I don’t think he’s going to need to progress much. He just needs to play his natural position. I would say it will be Derrick Wilson, because offensively he has nowhere to go but up. Last season I would rather have had Jae Crowder shoot a half-court shot than Wilson a 5-foot runner. His defense gives him great potential and if he doesn’t play much next year he may be the next Jamail Jones.

Anonymous Eagle: I’m going to go with Juan Anderson. His development was hindered last season between his two early injuries and his suspension, but he showed big effort when given an opportunity and flashes of ability as well. With a full summer on campus to work on both his on court play and his physical capability with Todd Smith, I can see a potential breakout sophomore season from the Oakland native.

Andrei Greska, Paint Touches: Todd Mayo. After “shooting” out of the gates in the non-conference season, his “shooting” began to fail him after a few Big East games. He oozes talent and he has the scorer’s mentality all the while playing excellent perimeter defense. With DJO gone, I think Mayo becomes the outlet when the offense sputters. I can’t wait to see his game taken to another level.

MarquetteHoops.com: I’m really interested to see how Jamil Wilson is able to improve.The past few seasons we have seen the evolution of guys like Hayward, Butler and Crowder at the same position, so I am intrigued to see if that trend can continue.  Wilson might have better physical tools than all of the above but we will see if he is able to pull it all together.

4. Would you rather Buzz Williams sign Wisconsin transfer Jarrod Uthoff or bank the scholarship for the 2013 class?

Mark Strotman, Paint Touches: No offense to Uthoff, who could very well succeed as a stretch-four under Buzz, but I really hope this last scholarship gets banked. A quick look at the talent Marquette is in play for in 2013 (Jameel McKay, Kendrick Nunn, Kyle Washington, Matt Thomas, Stevie Clark) makes it quite obvious that it’s the better way to go. Walk-on Jake Thomas can essentially act as a thirteenth scholarship, and it gives Buzz flexibility to take on a mid-season transfer. Not filling one’s scholarships isn’t negative. It’s simply planning ahead, and what’s ahead could be very bright for Marquette.

Matt Trebby, Marquette Radio: Buzz should just keep the scholarship for 2013, as his team will have plenty of depth next year. With six capable guards and a very potent front court, there is no need for the Badger reject from Iowa. If Uthoff comes, I would be shocked. With that being said, Jake Thomas should be thrown another scholarship. The team may not be losing much (Cadougan being the only one graduating), but it is always preferable to have that scholarship, especially with an impressive 2013 class.

Anonymous Eagle: I don’t care about taking on Uthoff just to screw with Bo Ryan and Wisconsin (and we’re the ones who run Badger Hate Week), and I’m not thrilled about the concept of Uthoff having to burn a year of eligibility while he sits out a transfer year after already red-shirting. Scout.com lists Marquette as interests on NINE of their top 100 for 2013 right now, and that’s WITHOUT including Deonte Burton and Duane Wilson, who are both in the top 100. A sophomore who hasn’t played a game in over 2 years or a freshman who’s one of three top 100 recruits arriving at MU to play together? Seems like an easy choice to me.

Andrei Greska, Paint Touches: Sigh, where’s the fun when we are all in agreement? I too believe in the banking strategy, should it come down to this scenario. Basing this analysis on scouting reports and hearsay, Uthoff just doesn’t fit into the style MU plays. Sure, a tall shooters are always welcome, but having him sit out for a year makes him much less appetizing. Bank the scholly and roll the dice for 2013.

MarquetteHoops.com: Give me a scholarship for 2013.  I have seen Uthoff play before (with the Iowa Barnstormers AAU team) and looking back at my notes, there’s no doubt he is a skilled and versatile player.  I thought his ability to work a two man game with the other big guy on his team was noteworthy. At the time I labeled him as an undersized 4.  He didn’t really play above the rim or show the athleticism necessary to switch out on the perimeter.  Therefore, I think there might be a better overall fit in the class of 2013.

5. Which team would you like to see Marquette play in the Big East/SEC Challenge?

Mark Strotman, Paint Touches: It helped Marquette when Norfolk St. shocked Missouri in the second round of the NCAA Tournament this year, but the basketball fan in me was crushed. Missouri doesn’t play the fastest paced game, but their bevvy of quick guards and outside shooting would make for a dream match-up with Marquette. Furthermore, it gives the Golden Eagles a chance to improve its RPI and resume, as Missouri should be a Top 25 resident all season long.

Matt Trebby, Marquette Radio: Kentucky. Why not? If Marquette loses, it’s not the end of the world. If they win, it’s huge. The Wildcats would be a very impressive victory for Marquette. While Kentucky will be extremely good next year, it would be great to have the chance to beat them. Not only would it be a fantastic victory, but even a loss could be beneficial. They would have played one of the best teams in the country and learned from it.

Anonymous Eagle: I’m sick of Vanderbilt, I don’t want to see Florida again for a long time, and Marquette already has LSU on the schedule. I’ll take either Missouri as revenge for the 2009 NCAA Tournament or Kentucky for revenge for showing up during Marquette’s game against Murray State in this year’s NCAA Tournament.

Andrei Greska, Paint Touches: Tennessee. I still remember the shady calls that gave the Vols 13 straight points from the charity stripe and a 12 point victory last time these teams played back in 2008.

Add in the Maymon factor and a victory over Tennessee would be O so sweet.

MarquetteHoops.com: While there has been some speculation of Missouri or Florida–neither of which I would mind–I will go against the grain and say Vanderbilt.  Yes, the same Commodore team we have lost to the past two years.  It just does not sit well and would like a shot at picking up a win against them.

Jae Crowder: Path to the NBA, 5/14

Miami’s beaches have been the source of Jae Crowder’s most therapeutic moments preparing for the NBA Draft, as well as his most challenging ones.

Following the completion of his final exams last week, Crowder left Milwaukee for Miami, where he had spent the last two months for weekend workouts at the Athletes Edge Sports Performance Training.

But the Big East Player of the Year has not had much time to enjoy the weather. Between two workouts per day, beginning at either 8 or 10 a.m., and lasting until 3:30 p.m., Crowder stays hard at work throughout the week.

“It feels better on my body and mind, and makes your day go a lot smoother,” Crowder said of the permanent move to Miami. “I’m really just sharpening up my skills, and I feel like I’ve gotten better.”

Crowder has split his days into two different sessions: one with ball handling and shooting and the other with agility and speed drills. The on-court workouts have not changed much since Crowder began training, but last week he got his first taste of beach workouts.

At the end of each week, Crowder takes to the beach with other athletes training at Athletes Edge and does a two-hour agility workout in the sand.

Jae Crowder has found Miami’s beaches to be both physically straining yet relaxing at the same time. (Marquette Tribune Photo)

“At first I was like, ‘How bad could it be?’ But all the beach work is challenging,” Crowder said. “All the lateral movement you have to do, along with pro agility drill and cone drill, all of that stuff is tough. You have to get in and out of your cuts, which sets the tone when you do it back on the court. It becomes easier.”

But as challenging as the beach has been in one sense, Crowder has also found it to be a time of reflection and relaxation in between training.

Sunday night, Crowder turned down a chance to play pick-up basketball with Brandon Knight and other NBA and International players who had returned to Miami for the off-season.

Instead, he took his girlfriend out to dinner. After, he walked along the beach with her; the same beach that two days earlier had been the location of a physically and mentally straining workout.

“I just think about everything, because that’s the only time I have away from basketball,” Crowder said Sunday night. “9 a.m. tomorrow I’ll be back on the court, so this weekend was the only weekend I really had off away from basketball, and I think it helps free up my mind.”

Crowder also has taken time to reflect on his unique path, from an out-of-shape high school senior point guard with little Division I interest to a potential first round NBA Draft pick.

“I sit on the balcony and I think about everything really,” Crowder said. “I think about this past year and all the years before Marquette, and everything goes back in your mind. I just want to take it one day at a time, and I have to take it one day at a time. Because when everything hits the ground running I have to make sure I’m the best individual I can be.”

Best landing spots for Jae Crowder and Darius Johnson-Odom

Jae Crowder and Darius Johnson-Odom each hope to have their names called on June 28 at the NBA Draft. And while both player’s goal is to be selected, there are certain teams that would be better fits than other for the two Golden Eagles.

Jae Crowder

At 6-foot-6, Crowder has worked this summer transitioning to more of a perimeter-oriented shooting guard/small forward. He will make his money on the defensive end, with the ability to knock down mid-range and 3-point shots. Size isn’t an issue, and he will be an above average rebounder for his position. Here are the teams best suited for Crowder.

Brooklyn Nets: The mid-season acquisition of Gerald Wallace filled the Nets’ void at small forward, but he has a player option he is considering opting out of in 2012-’13. Past Wallace, Gerald Green was a mid-season call-up from the D-League, who was signed to a season-long contract in March. He played well, but the Nets need depth at small forward, with only Damion Jones behind Green.

With MarShon Brooks and Anthony Morrow signed through next season, the Nets have solid depth at shooting guard. DeShawn Stevenson is a free agent.

Jae Crowder has the Golden Eagles one win away from a Sweet 16 berth. (Marquette Tribune Photo)

Toronto Raptors: Perhaps no team in the NBA needs help at small forward than Toronto. Second year pro Alan Henderson is a free agent this summer, James Johnson is interchangeable on the perimeter, and starter Linas Kleiza has battled injury each of the past two seasons. Crowder could also contend for a reserve role at shooting guard behind DeMar DeRozan. Gary Forbes, DeRozan’s backup, is a free agent after the 2012-’13 season.

Cleveland Cavaliers: Last year’s first overall pick Kyrie Irving has given the city of Cleveland hope post-”The Decision,” and Crowder would be another young player bursting with energy for the up-and-coming Cavaliers, who have just six players under contract for next year. Of those six, Daniel Gibson, Omri Casspi and Luke Walton are the only perimeter players.

Dallas Mavericks: The Mavericks have their NBA Title, but really showed their age this year after the Oklahoma City Thunder swept them in the first round of the NBA Playoffs. A major overhaul could be in store for the Mavs, including the statuses of shooting guards Jason Terry and Delonte West. Crowder would be a great fit in Dallas, and could also learn from veteran small forward Shawn Marion. Dallas prides itself on defense and likes to shoot the 3-pointer, Crowder’s two best assets entering the draft.

Darius Johnson-Odom

At 6-foot-2, Johnson-Odom will enter the NBA Draft as a scoring point guard. His ability to get to the basket will serve him well, but he will need to prove he can find open shooters and lock down on the defensive end to find a spot on an NBA roster.

Detroit Pistons:Brandon Knight was selected last year with the eighth overall pick to be the point guard of the future, but the Pistons have little depth behind him. Current backup Will Bynum has one year left on his contract, but the Pistons were 27th in scoring last year and could use Johnson-Odom’s scoring punch off the bench.

Darius Johnson-Odom will be key to Marquette keeping up with BYU’s pace. (Marquette Tribune Photo)

New York Knicks: Jeremy Lin will return next year healthy, but a gruesome knee injury to Baron Davis all but ended his career. Mike Bibby is a free agent, and rookie Iman Shumpert can interchange at shooting guard. The Knicks’ isolation-heavy, fast break offense would be perfect for Johnson-Odom to thrive in, and he would be a great change-of-pace with Shumpert off the bench.

Brooklyn Nets: Deron Williams has a player option next year he is likely to opt out of, leaving a major void at point guard. Backup Jordan Farmar also has a player option he should pick up, and Sundiata Gaines is a free agent this summer. Johnson-Odom would help a Nets team desperate for offense.

Phoenix Suns: The status of Steve Nash’s future in Phoenix hangs in the balance, and both Ronnie Price and Sebastian Telfair are free agents this summer. Johnson-Odom would be a great fit in the Suns’ up-tempo offense, and could see plenty of minutes his rookie year if everything works out.

Finney-Smith, Uthoff potential MU transfers: What each would bring

Buzz Williams and Marquette have one open scholarship remaining for both the 2012 and 2013 classes, and have reportedly shown interest in two intriguing players who could add a significant boost to the roster.

Virginia Tech forward Dorian Finney-Smith announced Wednesday morning he would transfer after one season with the Hokies. Seth Greenberg was fired two weeks ago and was replaced by former Virginia Tech assistant James Johnson. But Finney-Smith claims his decision had been “brewing for months,” but wanted to wait until exams were over to announce his decision.

Matthew Hatfield of VirginiaPreps.com said Florida and Marquette were two early schools that had interest in Finney-Smith.

A highly-touted recruit, the 6-foot-8 Finney-Smith was ranked as the 31st best prospect in the 2011 class by Rivals.com, and ESPN.com ranked the Portsmouth, Va. prospect 18th best in the nation.

He didn’t disappoint in his freshman season. Logging 29 minutes per game, Finney-Smith averaged 6.3 points and 7.0 rebounds in addition to 1.9 assists and 0.7 blocks per game.

His raw, 192-pound frame showed at times, as he made just 33.5 percent of his shots inside the arc. Forced to play inside, Finney-Smith struggled inside, but showed plenty of promise. he scored 17 points in a Feb. 12 win over Boston College, and secured 12 rebounds in an overtime loss to Duke on Feb. 25.

Dorian Finney-Smith would provide Buzz Williams another ‘switchable’ to play both inside and out. (Photo by Patrick McDermott/Getty Images)

He seemed to pick up steam as the season ended, connecting on 10 3-pointers and 8.3 points in Virginia Tech’s final seven games. Finney-Smith was selected to the ACC’s all-freshman team, along with Duke’s Austin Rivers.

It’s obvious why Williams is interested in Finney-Smith.

His inside-out game would fit in perfectly in Marquette’s system, and with a transfer year to sit out, head strength and conditioning coach Todd Smith could help Finney-Smith put on weight and add muscle.

In 2013-’14, when Finney-Smith would potentially hit the floor, forward Jamil Wilson and Davante Gardner would both be seniors, and incoming wing Trent Lockett would be gone.

Two years learning under Wilson, who Finney-Smith projects similar to, he would be able to step into a starting role his junior and senior seasons.

The talent is there, and Williams could have his next exciting project in Finney-Smith, if he ultimately chooses the Golden Eagles.

Another transfer Marquette has shown interest in is Wisconsin redshirt freshman Jarrod Uthoff. After a roller coaster of a process to ultimately secure his release and lift restrictions on future schools, Uthoff reportedly will visit the Marquette campus sometime this week.

A year ago, Uthoff was ranked as the  90th overall prospect by ESPN.com, and 149th overall in the 2011 class by Rivals.com.

One of the Cedar Rapids, Ia. native’s biggest strengths out of high school was his ability to run the floor. Uthoff said one of the reasons he decided to transfer was that he did not fit in Wisconsin’s offense, which has little fast break to it, if at all.

Uthoff’s athleticism is a question in terms of how it would fit in with Marquette, but he seems to hit the glass well and can shoot from outside as well.

At just 200 pounds, Uthoff could put on weight to improve his post play, but his role most likely would be from the 3-point line, with above-average defense and as a trailer on the fast break.

Of the two, Finney-Smith would be the bigger get for Williams. 2012 walk-on Jake Thomas could see the court this fall, allowing Marquette to take a transfer.

Williams remains active in recruiting the 2012 class, and there are other high school senior options, but these two transfers are legitimate options for filling Marquette’s final scholarship this upcoming season.

Transcript of Buzz Williams’ interview on 540 ESPN

Buzz Williams joined 540 ESPN’s Drew Olson and Dan Needles in-studio today to talk about his work as an analyst at CBS at the Final Four, and also about the happenings of Marquette basketball. You can listen to the entire segment here.

Here are Williams’ answers regarding Marquette basketball.

Trent Lockett situation, being a one-year graduate transfer:  “And some people have problems with that. There’s college coaches who are staunchly against that rule, more staunchly against that rule than kids who can leave after one year. And they’re entitled to their opinions. I don’t make the rules, I don’t set the rules, I have a hard time keeping up with the rules. And so whatever the rules are, how can we best help our program be what we want it to be on and off the floor. And I think Trent fits into that. I’m excited Trent is a part of that, but there are coaches that are against that rule.”

Davante Gardner’s off-season: ”Davante’s been OK. He’s 286 pounds today, that’s probably 8-10 pounds over where he should be. When you’re that big, when you take an extended period of time where you can’t do anything physically, it’s harder to get that weight off once it’s back on. And so he has been diligent in his work. Ernest and Todd have done a great job with him. I think this summer will be really important for Davante, just like I feel that-a-way for all our guys, but I think he’s been fine.”

Lockett and T.J. Taylor’s contributions next year: ”Obviously there’s more of a sample of evidence of what Trent has been able to do over his college career, as compared to T.J. I’ve known T.J. since he was a kid. He’s from the same county that I grew up in, so I’ve known he and his mom long before I came to Marquette. And so I have great trust and faith in who T.J. is and what his family represents.

I’m excited to have the opportunity to coach him, but also being realistic, he’s yet to play a Division I game. He’s yet to play a Division I game at the high-major level, so when you look at the teams that we play in non-conference and conference once our schedule is released, that’s expecting a lot from a kid who’s yet to do it. He’s older than your typical high school senior, and I do think there’s value in that, and I do think he will have a distinct niche on our team. But I think it’s presumptuous to go, ‘Hey, this is who he is,’ because he’s yet to do it. But I pull for him, I root for those kinds of kids. I think the combination of he and Trent will help us try to shore up some of what we lose from Jae and D.J..”

On Tony Benford’s head coaching position at North Texas: ”I’m so happy for Tony. I talk to Tony every day. He’ll be fine. He’ll be great, he doesn’t need any of my help. I’m very thankful he got an opportunity as a by-product of our success. He’s probably the best pro in every way that I’ve ever known in our business, and I have great respect for him. He took Bart Lundy, our operations guy, with him as a full-time assistant, which is outstanding for Bart and his family. So I couldn’t be happier for either of those guys. I think they’ll be great.

North Texas is the job I grew up wanting as a kid. It was about 45 miles from the little country town I graduated from. And if you were smart enough to go to college when you graduated, that’s where you went to college. And I wasn’t smart enough to go there, but in my discussions with the (UNT) athletic director prior to them hiring Tony, I said, ‘In my whole life, there were only two jobs I wanted: the head coaching job at Navarro College, because I worked for coach Orr, and the head coaching job at University of North Texas. And I’ve yet to accomplish either of those goals, but I can’t imagine there’s a better person that will represent your institution than Tony.’ He’ll be great. It’s a really good job, it’s surrounded by really good players, and they’ll be really good this upcoming year, and they’ll be good as long as Tony is there.”

On replacing Benford: ”I’ve returned every text, every call, every email from everybody that’s called. It’s amazing. I use these as opportunities to learn, use it as opportunites to grow and build relationships. On a deeper level or to begin a new relationship, NBA guys call, fired coaches call, guys that you would not imagine call. Agents call, search firms call, and I love listening to all of that. I don’t necessarily  subscribe to all that, but I listen to all of it beause I think it’s healthy, relative to my career and plight to be able to connect dots. And sometimes when you have jobs open, guys will reveal things to you that they won’t tell you when you do’t have a job open.

So similar to when I got this job, I was undeserving of the opporuntity, I understood that, and once I did get the job there was a mass concern of, ‘Well Buzz, we think we know who you are, but who are you gonna hire?’ And I was very slow and deliberate about who I hired, and not to be arrogant but I think I put together a really good staff, and what we’ve been able to do during our tenure together speaks for itself.

And which direction I go, I don’t know. I’ll pray about it, I’ll think about it, I’ll study it. Until we finish recruiting I’m not making any decisions. I think players are always more important than coaches, and because of the chair I sit in, the most important relationship is always with the guy that subs them in and out of the game. And so getting Trent was a big part of that, and we’ll see how it plays out from a recruiting perspective as the spring and summer unfold. But I had great respect, trust and relationship with Tony and with Bart, and as weird as I am and as unique as how we operate, I’m not real big on someone jumping on the boat because they think we’re good and they think they wanna be a part of our success yet they havent earned the ability to be part of our success.

Addressing junior college criticisms: ”When it comes to the perception of junior college players, I really like to hear the criticism, because I then know who those people are and what their stance is, relative to people’s lives. I was a non-qualifier out of high school. I could not have attended a D1 institution. Was it because intellectually I couldn’t have? No, it was because I never got the right ‘intel’ in the little country town I was from, that this is what you do to be admitted into a four-year, Division I institution. And so does that mean I was given a second chance? I don’t know.

How about Jae Crowder, who weighed 260 pounds as a high school senior. He went to a non-accredited junior college. He didnt know that. He had no idea. He was 260 pounds, he was a fat kid. So he was happy somebody would give him room and board, and then a year into his freshman year he goes, ‘These classes don’t count?’ So technically, did we give Jae a second chance? DJO was never cleared through the Clearinghouse. I know exactly why he wasn’t cleared through the Clearninghouse. It was not DJO’s fault. The high school he attended, it was not their fault. It was a clerical  error.

So if you think of all the guys we’ve signed, we have only signed two junior college players. Two straight up, didn’t qualify out of high school palyers. Dwight Buycks, MPS alum. And Jae Crowder. So Buycks, first MPS kid to play here since Terry Sanders. You gonna say now you can’t come back here because you didn’t qualify out of high school? I’m not doing that.

And then the second thing is Crowder, his first year nothing counted toward any four year diploma at any level, and three years later he’s player of the year. And not saying that the other two weren’t important, but he was player of the year in one of the best conferences of all-time. So are we gonna say, ‘Hey Jae, here’s the deal. You made a bad decision when you were a senior in high school, and you didn’t have the right people around you and you went to a non accredited school. We don’t want you to come to Marquette because of the perception, not that you were player of the year, not because you’re an NBA draft pick, not because you helped us to back-to-back Sweet Sixteen’s, but because before I knew you and you knew me, you made a decision that you didn’t know.’

And so I, kind of in a demented way, like it when people have the perception of, ‘Wow, there’s too many junior college guys on that team. Really? There was only one on our team last year. There’s only one, but they attended a junior college. So is it a second chance, because they could have attended a Division I school? No Division I school recruited DJO.

So again, like Oprah says, ‘everybody has a story.’ And so do I have an edge about answering that question? I do, I do. But i also have an edge in how I live and how I coach.”

How Trent Lockett fits into Marquette

Marquette received a verbal commitment today from Arizona State transfer Trent Lockett, a 6-foot-4 guard with one year of eligibility remaining.

Lockett tweeted this morning, “I’ve been a sundevil since 16. I love and appreciate the people and experience at ASU. Saying that, I am excited to finish my last yr at MU!”

A second team All-Pac 12 member last year, Lockett graduated today after three years at Arizona State. He majored in business communications, had a 3.3 GPA and also was named to the Pac 12 All-Academic team.

He chose between Marquette and Iowa State, telling the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel’s Tom Enlund that the Golden Eagles’ recent NCAA Tournament success and the school’s focus on basketball led to his decision.

The move to Milwaukee also puts Lockett closer to home and his mother, who is currently battling cancer.

So how does Lockett fit in, and where will he benefit Marquette most?

Trent Lockett will provide Marquette with senior leadership and a scoring punch, two things lost by the graduations of Darius Johnson-Odom and Jae Crowder. (Photo by Stephen Dunn/Getty Images)

First and foremost, Lockett will provide senior leadership to a team losing its two seniors, Darius Johnson-Odom and Jae Crowder. Marquette’s two seniors next year, Junior Cadougan and Chris Otule, are not the most vocal leaders on the team, but Lockett should step in and lead by example from day one.

As seen by his three-year graduation and impressive grade point average, Lockett will also lead by example in the classroom. It never hurts to have a graduate student who is serious about schoolwork around the rest of the team.

It’s no secret Buzz Williams loves length, and Lockett plays bigger than his size. An athletic wing, Lockett grabbed 5.8 rebounds per game in 2011-’12, a year after he averaged 5.3 boards per game his sophomore season.

His 15.7 defensive rebounding percentage last year would have ranked second on Marquette, and his commitment to the glass will help ease the loss of Crowder, far and away Marquette’s best rebounder last year.

Lockett’s solid frame and long arms will allow him to guard more than one spot on the floor. His 2.7 steal percentage last year also would have been second on Marquette, and his ability to play multiple positions will help Buzz Williams rotate the rest of the back court with more flexibility.

Lockett isn’t the outside shooter Marquette could have used with the losses of Johnson-Odom and Crowder, but he is highly efficient with the ball. He is best when getting to the lane where he drew almost five fouls per game, more than Crowder and the same as Johnson-Odom. Lockett shot a 71.1 percent from the free throw line last year, up from 66.2 percent his sophomore season.

From the outside, Lockett seemed to pick his shot selection wisely. He only took 51 3-pointers last year, but made 21 of them (41.2 percent). He doesn’t look to shoot from the outside, but he can hit them when the opportunity is there.

Lockett stated his reasons for choosing Marquette over Iowa State, but one has to be that he will be inserted into the starting lineup. A potential NBA prospect, he isn’t coming to Milwaukee to play in a reserve role.

With Junior Cadougan all but a lock to start at point guard, Lockett should enter as the “small forward” of Marquette’s three-guard offense.

That would leave one open spot, where Vander Blue would give Marquette a defensive boost. Todd Mayo, however, would give the Golden Eagles a much-needed 3-point threat, something Cadougan and Lockett do not provide.

Another wildcard is junior college guard T.J. Taylor, who would give Marquette the most versatility as a shooting guard who can handle the ball if needed. The sophomore lefty seems Big East-ready, but will need to prove his defensive worth to have a shot at the starting lineup.

A potential lineup of Cadougan, Blue, Lockett, Jamil Wilson and Chris Otule would be one of, if not the best defensive starting lineup in the Big East next year. The biggest question for next year’s team, of course, is who will make up for Johnson-Odom’s and Crowder’s scoring.

With Davante Gardner and (potentially) Mayo coming off the bench, the balance of Marquette’s offense and defense is really rounding into form.

Williams also has one more scholarship for 2012, but may bank it to use on the loaded 2013 class. Sophomore walk-on Jake Thomas may see minutes, which would give Williams more freedom in using or not using the last scholarship.

Lockett fills Marquette’s two biggest needs in 2012: leadership and scoring. He isn’t taking any plays off and could really thrive in Marquette’s up-tempo offense. Last year the Sun Devils played one of the slowest games in the country (63.6 possession per game), so Williams must see something in Lockett’s game that will transition well to Marquette’s style (71.4 possessions).

Warriors Abroad 5/3: Playoff Edition

Editor’s Note: This is the third installment of Warriors Abroad focusing on the goings-on of former Marquette players in their professional basketball careers.
If you have any suggestions or have any information as to the locations of player’s whose info we do not have posted, drop us a tweet or a comment. (Players whose names are underlined have their Twitter linked) Enjoy.   

NBA

Jimmy Butler: Chicago Bullls

  • Season Average: 2.6 points, 1.3 rebounds, 8.5 minutes
  • Recent game: DNP in 109-92 loss to Philly
  • MU Wiki
  • Remember when?

Lazar Hayward: Oklahoma City Thunder

  • Season Average: 1.4 points, 0.6 rebounds, 5.4 minutes
  • Recent game: DNP in 102-99 win over Dallas
  • MU Wiki
  • Remember when?

Wes Matthews: Portland Trailblazers

Steve Novak: New York Knicks

  • Season Averages: 8.8 pts, 1.9 rebs, 18.9 mins
  • Best 3-point percentage in the NBA
  • Recent game: 0 pts in 87-70 loss to Miami
  • MU Wiki 
  • Remember when?

Dwyane Wade: Miami Heat

  • Season Averges: 22.1 pts, 4.6 asts, 4.8 rebs
  • Recent game: 20 pts in 87-70 victory over NY
  • MU Wiki
  • Remember when?

___________________________________

2010-11


Dwight Buycks: Tulsa 66ers (NBDL)