Author Archives: Mike Nelson

Five Point Play V19: NCAA Tournament Edition

It’s March Madness baby. Everyone’s favorite time of the college basketball season. It’s win or go home.

Here is our Five Point Play previewing the NCAA Tournament. Also, attached is our bracket orchestrated by Mark Strotman, Andrei Greska and Mike Nelson. Click on the image for a closer look where you can actually read the teams.


1. Who is the most vulnerable No. 1 seed? When do you see that team exiting and why?

Mike Nelson, Paint Touches: Syracuse. The Orange lost Big East Defensive Player of the Year Fab Melo and with him a major contributor to their zone defense. Melo is a 7-foot shot blocking machine. In 30 games Melo has 88 blocks (2.9 blocks per game). I expect Syracuse to bow out in the Sweet 16, losing to Vanderbilt. If UNC doesn’t have John Henson, then it is vulnerable too.

Michael Wottreng, WMUR Sports: To avoid stating the obvious of Syracuse, I’ll go with North Carolina. John Henson’s wrist is a concern for the top seed in the Midwest. The ACC Defensive Player of the Year is the important player for Carolina at the defensive end. His ability to block and affect shots around the basket turn the Tar Heels into team 1A with Kentucky as the best team in America. When UNC won the national championship in 2009, the Tar Heels needed Ty Lawson’s foot to heal for them to make their run to the national title. The same can be said for the 2012 version with the health of Henson.

Alex Jesswein, Marquette Hoops: Syracuse. Losing starting center Fab Melo (arguably Syracuse’s most valuable player) really hurts the Orange. They struggled in the few games he missed earlier this season, and I can’t see them going past the Sweet 16 with out him.  My prediction is that Vanderbilt indeed knocks off the Orange in the Sweet 16.

Mark Freund, MUTV Sports: With the news breaking that Fab Melo will be out for the entirety of the tournament, I don’t think there’s any question that the answer is Syracuse. I see teams pounding the middle, forcing the famous Orange zone to collapse in the paint and leaving wide open looks on the perimeter. I think the Cuse squeaks by Kansas State in the third round before falling to Vanderbilt in the Sweet 16.

Andrei Greska, Marquette Tribune: Syracuse. The loss of Fab Melo is a death kneel for a team that depends so heavily on that 2-3 zone. The Orange have always struggled to keep opponents off the glass this year and without their 7-footer, this deficiency will be even more pronounced. 


2. Who is a double-digit seed you see making it to at least the Sweet 16? How far do you have them going and why?

Mike Nelson, Paint Touches: In our bracket, we have two double-digit seeds in the Sweet 16: Belmont and the winner of USF/Cal. Another team to watch for is Long Beach State. The 49ers have five players averaging double-digit points and senior forward T.J. Robinson averages a double-double (12 points, 10.1 rebounds per game). Long Beach State played power-conference teams like North Carolina, Pittsburgh, Kansas, Kansas State, and Louisville. With Dan Monson at the helm (former Gonzaga coach) this team has the leadership to do some damage.

Michael Wottreng, WMUR Sports: Long Beach State. It played one of the most difficult non-conference schedules in the country. The 49ers lost at Kansas by eight and at North Carolina by six. A veteran cast anchored by senior guard Casper Ware, who scored 29 against UNC, can pull of the upset against New Mexico and possibly Louisville. The Cardinals defeated the 49ers at the KFC Yum! Center by 13 in November, but the Cardinals inability to score against a potent offense could be their demise. The health of senior guard Larry Anderson will be critical to a run to the Sweet 16, but he expects to play.

Alex Jesswein, Marquette Hoops: I think Long Beach State is a team that could do real damage in the West region.  I think it can knock off fourth-seeded Louisville and fifth-seeded New Mexico to reach the Sweet 16.  The 49ers are battle tested and Casper Ware has the star power to lead them to a couple upsets.

Mark Freund, MUTV Sports: Assuming that California can get past USF on Thursday night, I see the Golden Bears making a run. This team isn’t great defensively, but it passes the ball very well and is efficient when it wants to be. I have California beating Temple and then, by way of another upset in the Midwest region, emerging victorious over Ohio in the third round before falling to North Carolina in the Sweet 16.

Andrei Greska, Marquette Tribune: South Florida. Man can that team play defense. It made Cal look like an intramural team last night and even though the Bulls shot out of their minds, that defense will stifle Temple and Michigan. That is as far as the Bulls are getting though.

3. Who’s a team, outside of the top-three seeds, you could see making it to the Final Four?

Mike Nelson, Paint Touches: We picked Vanderbilt to go to the Final Four in our bracket, but Louisville is another team to watch. The Cardinals are hot at the right moment. They are playing gritty defense during their four-game winning streak, forcing their opposition into an average of 16.5 turnovers per game and allowing 55 points per game. Peyton Siva is playing his best basketball of the season during the stretch (13. 8 points, 6.3 rebounds, 5.8 assists per game).

Michael Wottreng, WMUR Sports: Vanderbilt is a trendy pick to come out of the East and I select them mostly by default. No other seed has better matchups to the Final Four nor the talent level of the Commodores to make it to New Orleans. When Vandy plays to its potential, it look like a world beater. When it doesn’t, it look like a mediocre team that could make an early exit. Vanderbilt is too talented to lose to Harvard or Wisconsin which leaves a date with Syracuse. If the Orange had Fab Melo, I’d take the Orange all day, but Festus Ezeli is beginning to play to the expectations. Add John Jenkins and Jeffrey Taylor and they are a matchup nightmare for most teams.

Alex Jesswein, Marquette Hoops: I think the top 12 teams in the country are really, really good and don’t foresee any teams outside the top 12 making the Final Four but if I had to pick one, I think Vanderbilt is a team to watch.  Not only does it have an extremely balanced and senior-laden team, the aforementioned loss of Fab Melo to Syracuse opens the door for Vanderbilt to reach the Final Four.  John Jenkins and Jeffrey Taylor might be the best duo in the country as many MU fans witnessed first hand.

Mark Freund, MUTV Sports: I think it’s Vanderbilt. Teams that are hot always seem to perform well in the NCAA Tournament, and Vanderbilt is coming off an SEC Championship that saw the Commodores take down the team many are picking to win it all, Kentucky. After consecutive years of being bounced in the first round, I think that Vanderbilt’s veteran lineup is ready to make a lot of noise.

Andrei Greska, Marquette Tribune: Vanderbilt. I know the Commodores are the cool pick right now, but they simply have the best chance. They have three NBA level prospects and are riding high off of that SEC Tournament Championship over Kentucky. Plus, they got a fairly nice draw now that ‘Cuse is shorthanded.

4. Who’s a player you could see making a Kemba Walker like impact on his team and the NCAA Tournament this season?

Mike Nelson, Paint Touches: Buzz Williams singled this man out on Marquette’s media day in October and for good reason. John Jenkins. Vanderbilt’s leading scorer on the season (19.9 points per game) is a marksman on the field. He converted on 44.8 percent of his 3-pointers and 47.8 percent of his field goal attempts. The man can flat out shoot. He also is hot as of late, leading Vanderbilt to the SEC Championship title. During Vanderbilt’s championship run he averaged 18.3 points per game and had 23 in the semifinals against Ole Miss.

Michael Wottreng, WMUR Sports: Isaiah Canaan of Murray State. The Racers lost one game all year in large part to the probable first team All-American. Canaan is highly efficient averaging 19 points and shooting 48 percent from the floor, 47 percent from three, and 84 percent at the free throw line. The Racers play the first two rounds in Louisville, roughly a four hour drive from their campus, which could give them a bit of a home court advantage and will probably get the neutral fans in all of their games. Canaan is the kind of player that can put a team on his back and lead the way as long as the rest of the team can keep the games close.

Alex Jesswein, Marquette Hoops: The top teams in the country all seem to be more balanced offensively than the Huskies were last year, but I think the 2012 NCAA Tournament could be a coming-out-party of sorts for North Carolina’s Harrison Barnes.  With John Henson’s status up in the air, the Tar Heels will need Barnes to step up and perform like an All-American if they want to win it all.

Mark Freund, MUTV Sports: : Though he might not get to play for very long, I think Doug McDermott of Creighton is a guy that can take over this tournament. He’s averaging over 23 points per game this season, and he’s scored at least 20 points in six of his past seven games, including 33 in the Missouri Valley Conference title game. If the Bluejays can somehow get past Alabama and UNC, look out for Doug McDermott.

Andrei Greska, Marquette Tribune: Anthony Davis. As heralded as the human uni-brow is, he is no where near the ceiling of his potential. He’s the best defensive player bar none and I think the Tourney is when he decides to turn it up offensively as well. His team may be stacked but Kentucky needs Davis in beast mode

5. Give us your Final Four and your national champion and tell us why they will make it.

Mike Nelson, Paint Touches: Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio State, and North Carolina are in my Final Four with Kentucky and North Carolina meeting in the championship. This is the year that John Calipari finally gets his championship. Kentucky has been the most talented team throughout the season and with concerns with John Henson’s wrist prior to the tournament, Kentucky is the smart money.

Michael Wottreng, WMUR Sports: Kentucky, Missouri, Vanderbilt, and North Carolina with UNC over Missouri for the title. Kentucky may have the most talented team in the country, but it’s been a long time since it was tested by an elite team. Vanderbilt challenged the Wildcats three times this season before breaking through in the SEC Championship game. John Calipari’s team has had a lot of talent in years but have never won a national championship. Until he wins a title, I can’t pick any team that he coaches. The Tar Heels were the preseason number one team in the country and I expect Roy Williams to work his magic in the Tournament to lead his team to six straight victories.

Alex Jesswein, Marquette Hoops: Kentucky, Ohio State, North Carolina and Michigan State are in my Final Four.  From there I see Kentucky and North Carolina facing off in the championship with the Tar Heels coming away victorious in a very tightly contested game.

Mark Freund, MUTV Sports: Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio State and North Carolina are in my Final Four, with North Carolina topping Kentucky to cut down the nets. I’ve always been a big proponent of experience, and the Tar Heels match up nicely with Kentucky. Despite all the talk about Anthony Davis versus John Henson, I think one of the key matchups will be at the point guard position, where UNC’s Kendall Marshall has the advantage over the less experienced Marquis Teaque.

Andrei Greska, Marquette Tribune: Kentucky because it has the most talent and have locations that will make any arena “Rupp 2.” Missouri because I can’t see Marquette taking the Tigers down. Vandy for the aforementioned reasons. Kansas because Robinson and Taylor make up a duo that is simply lethal. I have Kentucky and Kansas advancing with Calipari cutting down the nets for the first time in his career (before mailing them back in three years).


MU sinks like the Titanic at the Big East tournament

Marquette had never been better than a five-seed at the Big East Championship.

It had never boasted the Big East Player of the Year.

It never had two players named first team all-conference since the program entered conference play in the 1989-1990 season.

But this season Marquette had it all. It was the consensus No. 2 team in the best basketball conference in the country.

Despite that, Marquette laid the biggest egg of the Buzz Williams era. This team was like the Titanic entering the Big East Championship: It was all hype that ended in an epic fail.

“I’ve never felt like this. I don’t even know how to explain,” Jae Crowder said after the 74-61 loss to Louisville.

It was the most disappointing loss of the season, and it started in the first six minutes of play. Marquette had five turnovers, went 3-of-9 on field goals, and allowed three offensive rebounds. Marquette went down 21-6.

“We didn’t bring enough energy in the first half and they just took us apart,” Darius Johnson-Odom said.

He’s completely right.

“We never got into that groove, that groove that we normally play with,” Jae Crowder said.

You got that right.

But that should have been nothing for Marquette. The Golden Eagles went down 18-2 to Louisville on Jan 16 and overcame that deficit. Marquette was the comeback king of the Big East.

“We’ve been in that situation so many times at the beginning so we were like, ‘it’s all right. We’ll come back,’” Derrick Wilson said.

At least they had the right mentality. But it was poor execution.

“I’m disappointed because we never played our best basketball,” Crowder said. “If we had played our best basketball and gotten beat, (then OK), because they made more plays. But we never got into a rhythm.”

Marquette looked unprepared, nervous and out of sync on the biggest stage of its season, allowing 26 offensive rebounds and turning the ball over 26 times. That’s not the way Marquette won 25 games this season.

“I did a really bad job. If your team has 26 turnovers, which is the most during my tenure as head coach,” Buzz Williams said, “and if your team allows 26 offensive rebounds, which is the most it has allowed since I’ve been the head coach, it’s on the head coach.”

Kudos to Buzz for taking the onus on Thursday’s loss. Marquette was never all there, something for which the head coach should take responsibility.

Beyond the team-high eight turnovers of Junior Cadougan it was Crowder who was the most off.

Crowder, playing in his first game since being named the Big East Player of the Year posted a double-double (10 points, 10 rebounds). But it didn’t feel that way. The 6-foot-6 forward was in foul trouble most of the night, altering his style of play.

It came on a night when he went without the dreadlocks that distinguish him. Instead, he rocked cornrows after getting his haircut.

“I ain’t wearing this anymore. I’m going back to what I know how to do. You won’t see this (look) anymore,” Crowder said.

Like Samson, from the Biblical tail of Samson and Delilah, Crowder wasn’t the same player without his hair.

Nor was Marquette.

Jae, DJO and Buzz post game

Q: Any real positives that come out of tonight’s game or was tonight one of those games you’ve got to get rid of right away?

Jae Crowder: We got a chance to build on it going into the tournament. Look at the mistakes we made and try to learn from it, so it’s a lot of positives can come out of a loss, no matter what point of the year it is. Of course it is for us.

Q: Talk to us about all the turnovers.

Darius Johnson-Odom: We work on our press like every day. Wasn’t disciplined enough to get to our spots. I think they kind of forced us into turnovers with a lot of their pressure. They kept hounding us. They did a good job of forcing us into turnovers.

Q: Were you surprised by the type of pressure and how they were able to sustain it throughout the game?

Darius Johnson-Odom: I think we had an idea that they were going to pressure us. I didn’t think it was going to be at a high level like that. That’s why I think a lot of guys, including myself, we didn’t get to spots like we were supposed to, and it caused a lot of tension on ourselves and a lot of stress on ourselves where we tried to make plays because of it, and we ended up turning the ball over.

Q: Is there an adjustment factor to playing with Davante after playing with Jamil for all those games?

Darius Johnson-Odom: Think everybody knows how Davante plays. We know what he’s going to bring us, so I don’t think there is an adjustment level for us. We’re pretty close, and we pretty well understand our teammates.

Q: Jae, you went into the second half with three fouls. What was your mindset coming into the second half?

Jae Crowder: Told them to pick up a quick one. Wanted to try to get an easy basket, as well, but I picked up another one for my fourth foul. I was trying to make  a play, trying to get some momentum for our team, and they called me on one. So I was just trying not to get one quick one,  but it happened.

Q: Darius, talk about the two-day layoff coming into this. Did you feel like you were a little bit rusty at all?

Darius Johnson-Odom: Not at all. We were here last year, the same spot against Louisville, and I thought everybody was mentally focused. We were ready. We didn’t bring enough energy in the first half and they just took us apart. A lot of it is on ourselves. We gave a lot of offensive rebounds, and 26 turnovers, just ain’t going to do it. We have to learn from what happened.

Q: Did you think the last four minutes of the first half was key?

Darius Johnson-Odom: Yeah, I do think it was key, but it was a lot of little things that we didn’t do that were key also. We just have to learn from it.

Q: The NCAA Tournament, what do you think are the adjustments you have to make, not just from this game but from past games?

Buzz Williams: I don’t think we’ll make any adjustments. It’s ground hog day every day with them. So when you get to tournament play, just like here, if you lose, you go home. We’re fortunate that our body of work allows us to play another game, but from this point you lose, you go home and you don’t get to play again until next November.

Q: Can you pinpoint all the turnovers on anything?

Buzz Williams: I did a really bad job. If your team has 26 turnovers, which is the most during my tenure as head coach, and if your team allows 26 offensive rebounds, which is the most it has allowed since I’ve been the head coach, it’s on the head coach. It wasn’t just Junior. Junior is our primary ball handler, but every player that played more than three minutes had a tunrover. So it’s not just Junior. Junior is going to have more because he handles it more, but if you play more than three minutes and you have a turnover, if every player has a turnover, then I’ve done a bad job.

Q: How do you asses the defense in the first half, giving up 50 points?

Buzz Williams: Yeah, a lot of that, if you give up points off turnovers and if you give up points off offensive rebounds, and if you give up points off transition, I’m not sure how many points they scored in the half court. And if you were to divide that up throughout the game, again, I don’t know what the total would be. Having said that, that’s how they play. That’s why they won. That’s why they were playing us tonight. That’s what they feed off of is points from their pressure, points from transition, points off, offensive rebounds. I’m not sure that they’ve had a better meal all year long than what we served them tonight.

Q: Is this kind of like the worst case scenario, to play a team that plays your style?

Buzz Williams: I don’t know. I think if you study our 31 games prior to now, we probably are just as good playing against teams that are like us. This is an aberration relative to how we typically play. Entering tonight, we were averaging 12 turnovers, and tonight we had 26. And entering tonight, 65 percent of our baskets through 31 games had been assisted. That was fifth in the country.

Our assist to turnover ratio was 1.38, points per possession, 1.09. If you look at all of our numbers, not being arrogant at all, they’re pretty good. And so the recipe that we have through 31 games and 25 wins is pretty specific and I think we’ve honed that. our plyaers understand that. And we never cooked by the right recipe tonight.

Any team, no matter their size, somebody said they were faster than us. I haven’t heard that since I’ve been employed here. But I guess you are fast if you have 26 turnovers and 26 offensive rebounds. We probably did look slow, slow and poorly coached.

Q: When Gorgui went out with a third foul with nine minutes left, did you feel that was a turning point in the game?

Buzz Williams: No, I thought we were playing from behind from the very beginning it never seemed to be in sync. Seemed like we just kept passing the mic at a karaoke bar and I’m not sure of the words, you try. We were kicking th eball everywhere. They were taking it from us, just no good. Never in rhythm. Never in sync. I thought Gorgui was outstanding, but collectively, like if you look at their numbers, Kuric had 20, Behanan 12 and eight, Gorgui eight and 10, Siva 18 and eight, Russ Smith, 12 and three, Jared Swopshire, that’s a career high for him, 12 rebounds in 20 minutes. They all played well.

Q: You said 26 turnovers and 26 offensive rebounds is on you. Is that not being prepared for it?

Buzz Williams: I would say that however you could deduct what would lead a team that’s had the success that we’ve had to 26 turnovers and 26 offensive rebounds, I think it’s a variety of things. So you can Twitter, write, whatever you think it would be because that would be included.

Q: How do you guys bounce back after this and get ready for the tournament?

Jae Crowder: You just clear your head, wait for the oppponent that you’re going to get matched up with some Sunday and find out what they like to do. But at the same time work on what got us to this point. I feel like we’ll be fine once we get back to what we do and study the next opponent and get back to them and we’re looking forward to the challenge.

Zone defense unkind to MU

It’s a little known fact that Marquette likes to get out and run. Most people view Marquette as a a half-court, methodical team.

Kidding.

Marquette doesn’t like to play in the half-court. Nor does it like to play methodically. And combating a zone takes place in the half-court and forces an offense to play methodical.

When Marquette has to play like that, it struggles.

Look at the Cincinnati game Wednesday. The Bearcats zoned up Marquette and forced the Golden Eagles into 17 turnovers while Marquette forced only seven turnovers. Nor did the Bearcats allow Marquette fast break opportunities – Marquette scored just five fast break points.

“Our offensive efficiency is tied to our defensive efficiency, and we were very poor in that regard,” Buzz Williams said after the 72-61 loss to Cincinnati.

The defensive efficiency wasn’t there as Williams said, but Marquette has trended towards under-performing against zone defenses.

In five contests where Marquette was zoned up for the majority of the game it averaged 71 points per game, 15.4 fastbreak points (11.4 if you exclude the 31 points in the first Cincinnati game), 13.6 turnovers, converted 41.8 percent of its field goals, 31.3 percent of its 3-pointers, and posted an 84:68 assist to turnover ratio (1.23:1).

In those five contests (Norfolk State on Nov. 21, at Syracuse on Jan. 7, Louisville on Jan. 16, Cincinnati on Feb. 11, and at Cincinnati on Feb. 28) Marquette is 3-2. Three of those contests were on the road or at a neutral site.

In its 25 other contests Marquette averaged 76.8 points per game, 15.3 fastbreak points, converted 46.8 percent of its attempted field goals, 35.5 percent of its 3-pointers, and posted a 431:318 assist to turnover ratio (1.4:1).

The biggest difference in Wednesday’s affair, compared to the other games against the zone, was Marquette’s inability to get any kind of consistent fast break opportunities.

Just look at the first Cincinnati game. Marquette relied upon its defense to create offense which led to open court opportunities rather than half-court opportunities against the zone defense.

“It’s the opposite of how we want to play. It slows the game down tremendously,” Jae Crowder said of facing a zone defense.

In order to fare better against zones Crowder said Marquette must start, “attacking it and not letting it attack us. We have a tendency of letting the zone defeat us,” which goes with the team’s basic offensive principles. Marquette wants to get into the lane, creating a paint touch, which allows for easier baskets or the opportunity for a kick-out for an open jumper.

If he were an opposing coach, Crowder said he’d run a zone against Marquette given its “lack of success” against it. But Crowder has “high confidence” that Marquette will figure out how to be consistently successful against zone defenses before the year is through.

“Us wanting to be an elite team, we have to adjust to whatever is thrown at us. We’ve been working on it (playing against the zone) starting yesterday (Thursday),” Crowder said.

Buzz Williams audio prior to Senior Day 2012

Buzz Williams met with the media Friday afternoon and talked about the Georgetown game and what Jae Crowder and Darius Johnson-Odom have meant to him and the program.